Gazeta Lodz - US Supreme Court says asylum seekers can be turned away before border

NYSE - LSE

BCC	0.36%	77.94	$
JRI	0.72%	12.661	$
BTI	1.27%	62.18	$
CMSC	-0.11%	22.04	$
NGG	0.67%	83.39	$
GSK	1.7%	51.975	$
RIO	0.94%	94.925	$
AZN	1.33%	185.48	$
RBGPF	0%	61.3	$
VOD	0.22%	13.84	$
RYCEF	3.15%	18.75	$
RELX	-0.4%	31.025	$
BCE	0.02%	23.205	$
BP	0.24%	37.95	$
CMSD	-0.5%	21.91	$

US Supreme Court says asylum seekers can be turned away before border

POLITICS 25.06.2026

US Supreme Court says asylum seekers can be turned away before border / Photo: © AFP/File

The US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that migrants seeking to present an asylum claim can be turned away before they reach the US-Mexico border.

Text size:

The policy, known as "metering," has not been in place since 2021, but President Donald Trump sought a ruling validating it as legal should it be reinstated.

The policy allowed US federal immigration agents on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border to turn away potential asylum seekers before they reached US soil.

The Immigration and Nationality Act allows an "alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States" to apply for asylum.

A divided appeals court ruled in 2024 that this applies to potential asylum seekers at ports of entry "whichever side of the border they are standing on."

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to reject this interpretation and the conservative-dominated court did so in a 6-3 ruling.

The question before the Supreme Court was "whether an alien who is stopped on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border 'arrives in the United States.'"

Justice Samuel Alito, in a majority opinion joined by the five other conservatives, said "an alien standing in Mexico does not 'arrive in the United States' by attempting, and failing, to set foot in this country.

"An alien 'arrives in the United States' only when he crosses the border," Alito said. "A person arrives in a destination when he enters within its area -- not before -- and that conclusion does not change because someone or something blocks entry."

Justice Sonia Sotomayor penned a dissent joined by the other two liberal justices.

"The Court's illogical interpretation is driven almost entirely by a fixation on a single word: 'in,'" Sotomayor wrote, and "blesses the Executive Branch's decision to slam the door shut on all who are fleeing persecution.

"The consequences of today's decision are predictable," she said. "More people will die. More people will attempt to cross the border illegally, and some will make it while others will not."

Trump campaigned for the White House on a promise to expel millions of undocumented migrants and has taken a number of actions since returning to the White House aimed at speeding up deportations and reducing border crossings.

The asylum case is one of a number of immigration-related cases the Supreme Court heard this term.

On Thursday, the top court backed a Trump administration move to strip deportation protections from some 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians living in the United States.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule next week on President Donald Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, which makes anyone born on US soil automatically a citizen.

T.Ostrowski--GL

Featured

'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center shuts in US: official

The controversial "Alligator Alcatraz" immigration detention center -- a costly Florida facility that became a symbol of US President Donald Trump's deportation drive -- has shut down after less than a year in operation, officials said Thursday.

US says wants deal with Iran, but not 'at any price'

Top US diplomat Marco Rubio said Thursday that there were limits to what Washington would accept in any deal with Iran, warning that permitting Tehran to charge fees in the Strait of Hormuz would open the door to "total chaos".

Colombian president-elect gives armed groups one month to surrender

Colombia's hard-right president-elect Abelardo de la Espriella on Thursday gave the country's guerrilla groups one month to surrender, taking a tough stand on an issue that helped propel him to victory.

Noosha Aubel and Dietmar Woidke: How Potsdam Is Letting Down a Young Child with Profound Disabilities

The state capital of Potsdam likes to present itself as a modern, child-friendly municipality. As recently as October 2025, the city administration celebrated the election of a “Lord Mayor for everyone,” when Noosha Aubel, 50, entered Potsdam City Hall with 72.9 percent of the vote. Born in 1978, Aubel built her career in child and youth welfare before rising to become a senior civil servant and, ultimately, Lord Mayor. Yet it is under her responsibility, of all people, that a morally shameful scandal is now unfolding—one that fundamentally undermines the city’s self-image as a socially responsible and inclusive community: a two-year-old child with an officially assessed degree of disability of 100 and care grade 4 has been waiting in vain for more than a year for the legally mandated daycare place with personal assistance.Our investigation is based on court documents, supervisory complaints, and press inquiries available to us. It reveals an alarming sequence of delays, unlawful referrals to other authorities, and a press office at Potsdam City Hall that appears intent on evading its duty to provide information through flimsy procedural maneuvers. The affected family does not regard the city’s conduct as an unfortunate isolated case, but as a structural failure. In 2022, the older sister of the child with profound disabilities was likewise denied a daycare place despite her severe disabilities—an officially assessed degree of disability of 100 and care grade 5. In that case, too, those responsible in the state capital of Potsdam failed completely, raising serious questions about morality, decency, callousness, and utter incompetence (https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/nachrichten/IRW-News--ACCESS-Newswire-Noosha-Aubel-Skandal-in-Potsdam-um-schwerstbehindertes-Kind-b9408cc0-6dbe-49d8-b664-7e5d788b2686).